We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Operating System
Topic Started: Apr 11 2005, 11:36 PM (2,761 Views)
Celticsfuture_8-ZNS
Start Al Jefferson!
[ *  * ]
OS X ^^^
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zach
Member Avatar
Missjayness
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
tropicaldawn
April 13, 2005 02:37 PM
Windows 3.11

Mmmm...that's possibly the best windows I've seen yet. :P

Quote:
 
I just installed Ubuntu Linux!


I loathe you. :angel:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nemesis
+o0 1337 |=0|- j00
[ *  *  *  * ]
Stop using Windows XP. It's visual look will slow your PC down like heck (unless you disable it) and it has the worst security features, EVER. Even Mac OSX is better.

Windows 2000 Professional is the best. Much more stable than WinXP because Win2K runs off of the WinNT Core, and WinNT is the most stable OS EVER. Sure, some say taht WinXP & Win2K have the same core, but they don't. The underlying concepts in the design of both is very different.

I have Windows 2000 Professional on one 80GB Western Digital hard drive, & of course, Fedora Core 3 Linux on my Maxtor 20GB.

SuSE is the suck. Use Fedora.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Zero Resistance-ZNS
eÜil Zero lÖrd™
[ *  *  *  * ]
Dude, Windows ME,XP,2000, NT, and the others, Suck.

They have less security, ya know.

So, 98,95,and 3.1 are teh pwns!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Cool Dude 2k
<?php echo "Linux"; ?>
[ *  * ]
I have Windows XP.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Das
Member Avatar
Smells of rich mahogany
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
deat
April 13, 2005 02:11 PM
Quote:
 
I just installed Ubuntu Linux!


I loathe you. :angel:

Good
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Francis
Member
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
[Offtopic] Now you have to add 'I am loathed' to your sig... [/random]

I use windows XP, I always mean to try out linux but never get round to it...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Seth
Member Avatar
I has a pony
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
ASDF123
April 13, 2005 05:39 PM
Stop using Windows XP. It's visual look will slow your PC down like heck (unless you disable it) and it has the worst security features, EVER. Even Mac OSX is better.

Windows 2000 Professional is the best. Much more stable than WinXP because Win2K runs off of the WinNT Core, and WinNT is the most stable OS EVER. Sure, some say taht WinXP & Win2K have the same core, but they don't. The underlying concepts in the design of both is very different.

I have Windows 2000 Professional on one 80GB Western Digital hard drive, & of course, Fedora Core 3 Linux on my Maxtor 20GB.

SuSE is the suck. Use Fedora.

Sigh. Such noobness.

1) If you think the theming engine slows things down, don't use it. However, some of us don't have computers made in 1999, so we actually have the 8MB of video card RAM required :rolleyes:

2) Worst security ever? Relatively speaking, I suppose. But it's not like that means j00 will be h4x0red if you use Windows. I've used it for a long time... funny how I've never gotten a virus, gotten any passwords stolen, &c.

3) 2K Pro is stable, it's true. But guess what? XP runs off EXACTLY the same core, except with MORE fixes. Hint: check the version numbers on the kernel. NT4 is 4.0. 2K is 5.0. XP is 5.1. Revision increment only. Huge chunks of the code are the same. WinNT is not the most stable OS ever, even though it is definitely up there. One of the *BSDs is probably the most stable AND secure. Too bad *BSDs are pains to run.
Quote:
 
Sure, some say taht WinXP & Win2K have the same core, but they don't. The underlying concepts in the design of both is very different.
This is just blatantly false; you have zero clue what you're talking about.

Fedora is the second worst Linux distro I have ever used. Bloated (have you SEEN how many services start at boot by default?) and slow. Mandrake was worse, but I forgive it because it's trying to be noob-friendly. Ubuntu is the best distro I have ever used; I think Debian children are just fantastic. SuSE offers EXTREMELY broad hardware compatibility, as well as bleeding-edge features (Beagle is even in 9.3; you won't find that in any other distro).

Research first, please.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jory
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Seth
April 14, 2005 05:19 PM
Mandrake was worse, but I forgive it because it's trying to be noob-friendly.

Are you saying everybody that can't get allong with a Linux distro right away it a n00b? in your eyes?
If so, I will now start disliking you for finding me a n00b :angry:
If thats not what you mean, just ignore above.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Seth
Member Avatar
I has a pony
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Nope, I'm saying that it tries to be helpful and have tools for everything, programs for everything, here a wizard there a button everywhere some bling-bling. That is great for some people. Not what I want though. Mandrake has its place in the Linux world just like all the rest though ^_^
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tropicaldawn (CC)
Member
[ * ]
3.1 is pretty stable. I have a 486, 16mb ram and 200mb hard drive.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Seth
Member Avatar
I has a pony
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
No way :blink:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Can you even run a 200mb HD on 3.1? :huh:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Das
Member Avatar
Smells of rich mahogany
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Seth
April 14, 2005 08:19 AM
Ubuntu is the best distro I have ever used

I got teh bestest. But I can't install things, guess I is still a n00b
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jimi
Member Avatar
LOST
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
tropicaldawn
April 14, 2005 01:08 PM
3.1 is pretty stable. I have a 486, 16mb ram and 200mb hard drive.

can u even run IE with that, can we see a desktop screen shot?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply